The PI is Dead, Long Live the PI – Let’s mourn the paper, but not the news

Leave a comment

Today was the last day I will get the Seattle Post Intelligencer on my doorstep in the morning. The 146 year old newspaper has run up against a failed business model and ceased being a traditional print based newspaper today. As of tomorrow, it will exist only as an online news site and it’s unsure what the experience will be.

First, let me shed a tear for nostalgia. No I’m not being trite. I have a lot of respect for what has gone has on before me. The Seattle PI has been a great local paper, although its history has lots of less than Pulitzer prize winning stories (remember the Pulitzer prize is named for one of the worst of the Yellow journalists of his day). That’s a long way of saying I hope the big revolving globe atop the PI’s headquarters continues to spin. I also shed a tear when the giant pink toe shaped “toetruck” was hauled away and was saddened when the twin tepee restaurant (horrible food) was torn down. All were symbols of Seattle and a loss to our popular culture.

But, I am less worried about the state of journalism in Seattle. For every professional journalist whose investigative reports protected us from corruption and misdeeds, I have had to put up with a thousand articles about non-news or yesterday’s news. I’ve also gotten way too used to having to read syndicated articles written thousands of miles away, purporting to speak to issues like employment, real estate and culture that have nothing to do with my local world.

Citizen journalists are far from perfect, but the same can be said for professionals. So let’s hope that citizen journalists will fill the void left by the loss of the PI and let’s hope that we can live without opening the morning paper, sipping a good cup of coffee and learning about man biting dog.

High ROI Marketing Strategies for a Down Economy

1 Comment

high-roi-tips1Last night I had the opportunity to moderate a great panel discussion on the topic of High ROI Marketing Strategies for a down Economy, held in conjunction with the Seattle Direct Marketing Association, SDMA. monthly dinner meeting.  The panel consisted of Andrea Schwarzenbach from Alaska Airlines, Andy Cotton,Yahoo, Jamie Lomas, AdReady, Brian Ratzliff, WhatCounts and Michael Williams, Williams-Helde.

The was a great turnout of about 85 marketing professionals from all over the Puget Sound and the discussion was both lively and thought provoking.  The overriding messages were; don’t be afraid of the economy, now is the time to try something new and pay more attenpation to your customers.

I had asked each panelist to come up with 1 tip that they could pass on to the attendees and we put all the ideas together in a short deck.  Take a look, download it or pass it on to a friend.  We all got a lot out of the evening and I hope you will as well.

B2B Recommendations for Turbulent Times

Leave a comment

I spend a lot of time with our clients figuring out the best strategy, the latest measurement tools and how to cut through the noise. But lately many of the questions have been around should B2B marketers be doing in times of economic turmoil, when no one is sure how far it is to the bottom and when we will start coming back up. So I carved out a little time and tried to come up with a few key best practices that might give at least a little direction. I’d really like to ask for everyone else’s thoughts. And maybe together we can chart the right course.

First, as the old saying goes, the best time to fix the roof is when the sun is shining. And while the weather metaphor may not match the current financial outlook, the lesson should be heeded by every marketer and by B2B marketers the most. Success in B2B focused businesses comes as a direct result to the quality of the relationship between companies. Traditionally this has been primarily the province of the direct sales force. But in an increasingly more online world, the quality of the relationship is measured by the quality of the online experience, which is most often managed by marketing rather than sales. So in hard times, when B2B purchasing is put on hold and buying cycles lengthen considerably, it is up to the B2B marketer to use all the tools at their disposal to nurture the relationship so that when the recovery comes and the buyers have money in their hands, they turn to those with whom they already have a relationship.

Second, in today’s world, the selling of technology is becoming a larger share of B2B transactions and the process of buying and selling technology is changing rapidly. IT purchases used to be the almost exclusive realm of technology professionals. They would recommend new technologies, deploy them and have complete responsibility for their support. And to many business users, how that technology worked and how it worked together was a mystery that went well beyond both their expertise and their interest. Now however, approaching the end of the first decade of the 21st century and when Gen X types are approaching what we used to call middle age, the roles are in flux. The rapid growth of Software as a Service and even Software plus Services, especially in the enterprise space, is testament to the fact that business owners are no longer willing to completely delegate technology to the IT department. For this new generation of business leaders, technology is not just the plumbing that runs behind the scenes, it is often the measure of innovation and a key differentiator in their business. For the B2B marketer, this means that technology can’t be packaged just for the geeks and promoted by the proverbial speeds and feeds, it must be presented to the business decision maker and must demonstrate the business value it delivers. It’s solution selling at its most basic.

Next, it’s not only that technology is moving out of the server room, it’s also being taken home. According to a recent survey of online adults, 77% used Microsoft Word at home as well as 58% used Microsoft Excel, once an exclusive business tool. What does this mean to a B2B marketer? The line between B2B and B2C customer is becoming blurred as the line between our work and our home lives fades. We are taking traditionally business applications like Word and Excel home and we are bringing Facebook and Twitter into the office with us. This is especially important as consumer products lead the innovation race and it’s just as likely that a business will be clamoring to get the latest B2C products and services, but use them in a business context. So the B2B marketer has to recognize that their audiences may be interested in their products as a consumer and that their companies are competing against consumer products in the business arena.

Finally and perhaps the most important tip for today’s B2B marketers comes from one of my favorite analysts at Forrester Research, Laura Ramos. She’s been posting a series on Forrester’s marketing blog entitled, “B2B Marketing Obsolete, Really?” And one her best messages is, “For marketing to evolve, we need to learn to listen more than we talk.” The world of Web 2.0 is no longer an abstraction. According to the most recent data I’ve seen, 75% of online adults in the United States participate in some form of social media. And that number is fairly consistent across most age groups. It’s not just a bunch of tweens on MySpace. Companies are being talked about on the Web, B2C and B2B alike. Business people are seeking out their peers to research and rate products and companies alike. And if you are not reaching out to find out what they are saying, where they are living online and who they are listening to, you can bet your competitors are.

Bottom line, despite the economy, there’s a lot B2B marketers need to be doing now and its not just this quarter’s sales that depend on it. The future of their companies may depend on how they step up to the plate.

Keeping Ahead or Keeping Pace with Customers

Leave a comment

I’m attending the Forrester Research Consumer Forum in Dallas this week. As usual with Forrester, there is some very good information, the networking is great and the event is well run. My only criticism is that some of the analysts present snapshots of research that in some cases is months old and I’ve already reviewed it. This wouldn’t be necessarily bad if the in person sessions shed deeper insight or generated a lively discussion on the topic, but as in most conferences, the Q&A is weak and most discussions are conducted at a fairly low level of expertise.

The theme of this conference is “Keeping Ahead of Tomorrow’s Customer”. It’s a very important topic, especially in troubled economics times. And I was pleased to see that many of the sessions spoke to the guerilla in the room, namely how do we cope with the ups and downs we’re facing every time we look at the markets and the economic forecasts.

I will dive into some of the specific sessions in future posts, but I wanted to raise one question up front. While the theme is keeping ahead of tomorrow’s customer, shouldn’t the real theme be more of keeping pace with customers. It seems a throwback to the old school of marketing to think that we as marketers can keep ahead of customers, that we are responsible for controlling the conversation rather than being active participants.

Social Media: Why does brand insist on joining the conversation?

1 Comment

A colleague of mine, James Rice, participated in a great workshop held in Portland, Oregon, last week called Light Up Your Brand and I just wanted to share with everyone the PowerPoint deck that accompanies his presentation. Of course it loses something on its own, it was designed to illuminate James’ presentation, not be the presentation itself.

So what’s the topic? Social Media? WEb2.0? The death of advertising? Or simply a call attention to the fact that most marketing today is still centered on interruptive advertising? Most agencies are still figuring out how to deliver interruptive advertising on social media rather than using the media for what it’s designed for, having open, honest conversations among many, many people. James asks the question, why do brands insist on “joining the conversation” before they listen to it first and ask themselves what value they can bring before they join in. In fact, I wish most people would listen in first, think about what they can add of value and only then join the conversation, but that’s another topic all together. Check out James’ deck and join the conversation. Here’s the link: http://www.slideshare.net/ascentium/light-up-your-brand

It’s Still Marketing versus Sales

Leave a comment

I was attending a peer conference today, with CMOs, VPs of Marketing and fellow Marketing Services practioners.  We discussed the state of marketing today and exchanged thoughts on the challenges we all are facing.

On the surface, it was surprising to me, how little the issues have changed over the last decade.  The central issues were still a lack of resources and budget and the tensions between marketing and sales.  But once we got beyond these issues, the real dicussions started.  Is there any meat to Web2.0 tactics?  Is role-based marketing something really new, or is it 1 to 1 marketing in new clothes?  Which marketing automation tools are worthwhile and should we be investing in more PR?

The consensus?  The jury is still out, but at least there’s comfort in knowing we’re all facing the same issues and can still come together to share ideas and experiences.

Tomorrow start the Forrester Research Marketing Forum. 

Acquiring Online Ad Companies is missing the point

Leave a comment

There’s a little of déjà vu all over again happening.  Over the last few weeks major media platforms like Google, Yahoo and MSN (Windows Live) have been gobbling up content generators, in this case the content is online advertising companies.  I call these companies media platforms rather than media companies because at the core, they are means to the end (finding meaningful content) rather than an end themselves.

To me, this sounds suspiciously similar to the rise of the big ISPs like AOL, CompuServe and MSN just a few years ago.  In the case of Microsoft and MSN, I remember they went out and bought a lot of content companies resulting in successes like Slate and failures like Mungo Park (for those who don’t remember, it was an online adventure travel magazine started by Microsoft in the late ‘90s). 

Today, it’s not about controlling end user content, it’s about controlling online ads.  Yes, ads just like we’ve seen on billboards, in subway stations and on TV for generations.  Today’s online ads are far better targeted, can be much better tracked and are a lot cheaper than their traditional siblings, but essentially they are still pushed at consumers in much the same way.  And so it’s no surprise to me that big companies are flocking towards them, because while they are different, they’re still reassuringly familiar.

The real wins in marketing are not going to be around who can deliver the most interruptive messages across new media, they are going to be focused on who can harness the power of the consumers to be the brand stewards of the future.  New channels like blogs, wikis, RSS, communities integrated with a true media neutral multi-channel approach will be where the real gains will be.  Forrester has been promoting a customer-centric model for some time now as well as an integrated approach as represented by its Agency of the 21st Century.  Neither of which appear to me to be centered around advertising, regardless of online or not.

So good luck to Google and Microsoft.  You will probably make some pretty impressive gains in the online marketing space, but I don’t think you’re going to do anything to improve customer experiences and the real business gains felt as a result of adopting a collaborative approach to marketing.

Is it Time for a Marketing Innovation Center?

Leave a comment

In a recent post on the Marketers’ Consortium, Chris Kenton talked about the problem of creating metrics to measure the ROI of new social media channels.  In the post, Chris suggests that marketing organizations should allocate a small percentage of their marketing budgets to emerging marketing program.  I fully agree with the idea of an innovation fund for marketing.  In fact I’d take it one step further and throw out the idea of creating innovation centers to explore new methodologies, channels.  In the technology sector this is becoming common practice. 

At my company, Ascentium, our technology group has partnered together with Microsoft and several others to create and fund an innovation center in Portland, OR, at Portland State University.  Its stated purpose is to “foster the use of innovative software solutions in our local economies. Students, professional developers, architects, IT professionals, and researchers can learn about the latest software solutions created by developers throughout the Northwest.”  I see no reason why different organizations, agencies, leading companies and organizations like MarketingSherpa or the AMA, shouldn’t consider making small joint investments to find new marketing solutions the way technologists can come together to find new software solutions.

If anyone is interested in the idea, contact me and we can see if we can make it fly.

Social Networking is all about the Platform

Leave a comment

The other evening I attended an excellent event sponsored by the WSA, entitled, “Social Networking – More Popular than ever – But how will that translate into the business world”.  There were 250 plus people in the audience and a quality panel of entrepreneurs as well as representatives of Microsoft and Google. 

It turned out that there were several distinct topics being discussed.  First, there were panelists in the process of launching new social networking site like Zoodango.com and OthersOnline.com.  The questions to them revolved around how they will be able to stand out from the pack on new entrants and last long enough to succeed.  Secondly, there was the line of questions around what differentiates social networking in the business environment.  For example, one panelist stated that you should always use a pseudonym for privacy sake on a social network, but need to use your real name on a business network to lend credibility….

And the third topic, which was most interesting to me, was not about monetizing the companies that are building the social networks, but how to leverage the content, communication and community that takes place on these networks to promote your business objectives, regardless of what product or service you provide.  This I think is the core to understanding the power of social media.  With an ever increasing sense of déjà vu, I hear loads of new companies say they are going to put great content on the Web and then make money from the advertising that goes with it.  While this might work for some in the short term, I do not think that social media is well-suited as an advertising medium and more importantly, those marketers who are thinking of social media purely in terms of a new channel on which to use the same advertising techniques that have given us 50 years of the 30 second TV spot are missing not only the point, but also the power of the channel.

Frankly I don’t care whether a conversation happens on MySpace, LinkedIn, Facebook, Spaces or Zoodango.  It’s the content of the conversation that matters.  Social networking is allowing us the opportunity to share our opinions, experiences and preferences with an almost limitless audience in real-time.  It used to be said that an angry customer will go tell ten of their friends about a bad experience.  Today, a bad customer experience can be shared with millions in less time than it took to walk to the water cooler.  Consumers have greater leverage over the marketing message, the brand and ultimately the success or failure of the product or service in way unmatched in the history of marketing.

The business value of social networking and social media is to be able to influence that viral conversation so that it adds to your brand equity, not destroys it.  Mentos got a 14% lift in sales because a couple of crazies decided it would be cool to video themselves stuffing Mentos into Diet Coke and watch the explosion.  Once posted on YouTube, it has been seen by millions.  The message is that Mentos got the sales boost, YouTube was just the platform for the message to be communicated across the network.

In the not too distant future, we will see more Google’s buying up YouTubes, not because of their technology, but because of their potential to attach an audience to their platform.  The platforms will end being hosted and owned by the Google’s, Microsoft’s and maybe the Verizon’s, but the content, the communities and the value will be in the hands of those savvy marketers who understand how powerful good ideas and good customer experience can really be.

Newer Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.